The comprehensive resource for vacations and hotels marketed to the LGBT community




 

 

 

 


 

 

 

UK

Lesbian Couple Fights On – But Not Through the Courts 

 

Appeal impossible through lack of funds


 

 



 

 

 
Sue Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger outside the High Court in London last July.  The court ruled that their Canadian marriage was not a "marriage" in the UK. 
 

YORK, October 11, 2006  –  The lesbian couple whose legal Canadian marriage was declared invalid by the UK High Court’s Family Division earlier this year has vowed to fight on. 

However, university professors Sue Wilkinson, 52, and Celia Kitzinger, 50, will not be taking their fight to the Court of Appeal.

They had hoped to do so, but – unusually for the Family Division – costs were awarded against them. 

The couple now face a bill of £25,000 – their life savings – for the government’s legal costs.  They cannot afford to finance an appeal, which could cost the same, if not more.

“This financial penalty is clearly intended to deter us from seeking justice”, said Sue Wilkinson. “But our marriage is too important to simply give up.

“We will continue to fight for equal marriage rights for ourselves and for other same-sex couples.  As we cannot pursue a legal challenge, we will campaign in other ways instead", declared Celia Kitzinger.

Their campaign, Equal Marriage Rights (www.equalmarriagerights.org), has so far documented the couples own legal case and is now appealing for donations to help them meet the government's bill.  Sue and Celia plan to expand the campaign to support other same-sex couples bringing legal cases, and to use the political process to advocate for marriage equality. 

Speaking on behalf of Liberty, the human rights organisation which backed the couple’s High Court challenge, Joanne Sawyer said:  “Celia and Sue bravely took the first step on the road to securing equal marriage rights for same-sex couples.

“I have no doubt that the High Court judgment will in due course be viewed as being out of step with contemporary values, and wish them well in their future campaign.”

Peter Tatchell of the lesbian and gay rights group OutRage! thanked the couple for mounting an important, historic legal challenge to the ban on same-sex marriage.

“They are true pioneers in the battle for lesbian and gay equality,” he said.  “Although they were not successful in the courts and lack the funds to appeal, Sue and Celia have blazed a trail that others will follow.  When the battle for marriage equality is finally won, people will look back and salute Sue and Celia for their pioneering contribution.”

Sue Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger were legally married in Canada in August 2003 and when the UK’s Civil Partnership Act came into force in December 2005, their legal marriage was automatically converted into a civil partnership.

They mounted a landmark High Court case to challenge the British government’s ban on same-sex marriage.  With the support of the human rights organisation, Liberty, who provided pro bono legal representation and advice, Wilkinson and Kitzinger sought a declaration of the validity of their marriage (as a marriage, not as a civil partnership) in the UK High Court. 

Their lawyers argued that any failure to recognise the validity of their marriage would constitute a breach of their human rights under the European Convention.  A heterosexual couple married abroad would automatically have their marriage recognised as a marriage in the UK – treating same-sex couples differently is discriminatory. 

The case was heard in June 2006, and judgment was handed down on 31 July. 

Sir Mark Potter, President of the Family Division, agreed that there is discrimination between same-sex and different-sex couples.  But, he ruled, this discrimination is justified in order to protect the traditional concept of marriage as between a man and a woman, primarily for the purpose of procreation; and in order to support the traditional nuclear family.  He declared Wilkinson and Kitzingers marriage invalid, and said that a same-sex relationship does not constitute a family.

■  If you wish to donate to the fund to help pay for the the costs of the case, please visit www.equalmarriagerights.org for details.

 

 

 

Got an opinion on this article?  Leave your comment here.

  Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Posted: 11 October 2006 at 00:00 (UK time)

 

 

 

ARCHIVE LATEST NEWS CONTACT EMAIL