| |

■
Sue Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger outside the High Court
in London last July. The court ruled that their Canadian marriage
was not a "marriage" in the UK. |
|
YORK, October 11, 2006 –
The lesbian couple whose legal Canadian marriage was declared invalid by
the UK High Court’s Family Division earlier this year has vowed to fight
on.
However,
university professors Sue Wilkinson, 52, and Celia Kitzinger, 50, will not
be taking their fight to the Court of Appeal.
They had
hoped to do so, but – unusually for the Family Division – costs were awarded
against them.
The
couple now face a bill of £25,000 – their life savings – for the
government’s legal costs. They cannot afford to finance an appeal, which
could cost the same, if not more.
“This
financial penalty is clearly intended to deter us from seeking justice”,
said Sue Wilkinson. “But our marriage is too important to simply give up.
“We will
continue to fight for equal marriage rights for ourselves and for other
same-sex couples. As we cannot pursue a legal challenge, we will campaign
in other ways instead", declared Celia Kitzinger.
Their
campaign, Equal Marriage Rights (www.equalmarriagerights.org),
has so far documented the couple’s
own legal case and is now appealing for donations to help them meet the
government's bill. Sue and Celia plan to expand the campaign to support
other same-sex couples bringing legal cases, and to use the political
process to advocate for marriage equality.
Speaking
on behalf of Liberty, the human rights organisation which backed the
couple’s High Court challenge, Joanne Sawyer said: “Celia and Sue bravely
took the first step on the road to securing equal marriage rights for
same-sex couples.
“I have
no doubt that the High Court judgment will in due course be viewed as being
out of step with contemporary values, and wish them well in their future
campaign.”
Peter
Tatchell of the lesbian and gay rights group OutRage! thanked the couple for
mounting an important, historic legal challenge to the ban on same-sex
marriage.
“They are
true pioneers in the battle for lesbian and gay equality,” he said.
“Although they were not successful in the courts and lack the funds to
appeal, Sue and Celia have blazed a trail that others will follow. When the
battle for marriage equality is finally won, people will look back and
salute Sue and Celia for their pioneering contribution.”
Sue
Wilkinson and Celia Kitzinger were legally married in Canada in August 2003
and when the UK’s Civil Partnership Act came into force in December 2005,
their legal marriage was automatically converted into a civil partnership.
They
mounted a landmark High Court case to challenge the British government’s ban
on same-sex marriage. With the support of the human rights organisation,
Liberty, who
provided pro bono legal representation and advice, Wilkinson and Kitzinger
sought a declaration of the validity of their marriage (as a marriage, not
as a civil partnership) in the UK High Court.
Their
lawyers argued that any failure to recognise the validity of their marriage
would constitute a breach of their human rights under the European
Convention. A heterosexual couple married abroad would automatically have
their marriage recognised as a marriage in the UK – treating same-sex
couples differently is discriminatory.
The case
was heard in June 2006, and judgment was handed down on 31 July.
Sir Mark
Potter, President of the Family Division, agreed that there is
discrimination between same-sex and different-sex couples. But, he ruled,
this discrimination is justified in order to protect the traditional concept
of marriage as between a man and a woman, primarily for the purpose of
procreation; and in order to support the traditional nuclear family. He
declared Wilkinson and Kitzinger’s
marriage invalid, and said that a same-sex relationship does not constitute
a family.
■ If you wish to donate to the fund to help pay
for the the costs of the case, please visit
www.equalmarriagerights.org for details.