HOBART, August 15, 2008 – The
Tribunal hearing a case against the Australian Red Cross gay blood ban has
been told today that if the current bar on gay blood donation is lifted, a
single HIV-positive blood donation from a gay man will slip through clinical
screening in Tasmania once every 197 years.
If only gay men who have safe sex
are allowed to donate, as sought by the man who initiated the current gay
blood ban challenge, Michael Cain, that figure decreases to once every 5769
years.
The startling figures were put by
Mr Cain's lawyer, Peter Tree SC, during today’s cross examination of
Canadian risk assessment expert and Red Cross witness, Dr William Leiss, and
were based directly on statistics provided to the Tribunal by Dr Leiss.
Dr Leiss is the author of a
Canadian study which upheld that country’s lifetime ban on gay blood donors,
and declared that a one year deferral like Australia’s would “...constitute
a covert and unacceptable risk transfer from male homosexual and bisexual
community to the community of blood recipients. Such a transfer would be
both unreasonable and unfair.”
During cross examination Mr Tree
pointed out that Australia has a relatively safe blood supply despite Dr
Leiss’ predictions.
Also today, evidence from US
mathematical epidemiologist, Dr Travis Porco, was presented to the Tribunal
showing that mathematical models about male-to-male sex risk relied on by
risk assessors like Dr Leiss are flawed.
According to Dr Porco’s statement,
which has gone unchallenged by the Red Cross: “Because HIV risk behaviours
are relatively well understood, it is possible to classify men along a
spectrum of risk (with) uninfected MSMs who have been ... in an exclusive
monogamous relationship with an uninfected partner at very low or even zero
risk.
“It is [my] concern that indefinite
deferment of donation from very low risk MSMs provides only illusory safety,
while other practices which have allowed HIV-positive donations to occur
have been continued.”
Evidence provided on Monday by US
epidemiologist and bio-ethicist, Dr Scott Halpern, alerted the Tribunal to
the alarming fact that 1 in 100 people who are infused with blood older than
14 days will die, and that 13% of blood is older than 14 days when it leaves
the Australian Red Cross collection centres.
Mr Tree asked Dr Leiss if this was
a far greater risk than that posed by gay men who practise safe sex in
monogamous relationships.
Dr Leiss said he could not respond.
The hearings continue on Monday
with evidence from Dr Paul Holland and the architect of Australia’s HIV
response, Mr Bill Bowtell.
The gay blood donation case
instigated by Michael Cain began last Thursday and will continue until the
end of this month.
Mr Cain is seeking a blood donation
policy which screens donors for the safety of their sexual activity rather
than the gender of their sexual partner.
SEE ALSO
Bio-Ethicists Address Gay Blood
Donor Hearings. Two bio-ethicists today addressed the inquiry
underway in Tasmania into gay blood donation.
(UK Gay News, August 13, 2008)
Tasmanian
‘Gay Blood’ Inquiry Hears that Safe Sex Works.
An inquiry into the current ban on
gay blood donation has heard that safe sex is effective in reducing HIV
risk. Social researcher, Associate Professor Anne Mitchell, today told
the Tasmanian Anti-Discrimination Tribunal that risky sexual activity is not
as widespread amongst gay and bisexual men as some studies suggest.
Full witness
statement of Prof. Anne Mitchell.
(UK Gay News, August 12, 2008)
Gay Blood Ban Hearing: Red Cross Accused of “Scare
Tactics”.
Gay activists have accused the Red
Cross of scare tactics on the first day of a hearing
into Australia’s gay blood ban, in Hobart today.
(UK Gay News, August 7, 2008)
Groundbreaking Gay Blood Ban Case Starts Thursday. The first full hearing in a groundbreaking gay blood ban
case begins in Hobart, Tasmania, on Thursday before the Tasmanian
Anti-Discrimination Tribunal.
(UK Gay News, August 5, 2008)
LINK
 |
|
website |
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Licence.
|
Posted: 15 August 2008 at
12:00 (UK time) |